Chapter 7.C.3 Pregnant Women
and Drug Use
Notes: Maternal Substance Abuse
2. Two Views on Legislative Intent.
The South Carolina Supreme Court found
that McKnight had received ineffective assistance of counsel and reversed her
conviction in 2008. State v. McKnight, 661 S.E.2d 354 (S.C.,
2008).
3. The Constitution and the Prosecution of Pregnant Women.
For commentary on the issues see Michele
Goodwin, Prosecuting the Womb, 76 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1657 (2008); Julie B.
Ehrlich, Breaking the Law by Giving Birth: The War on Drugs, the War on
Reproductive Rights, and the War on Women, 32 N.Y.U. Rev. & Soc. Change 381
(2008); April L. Cherry, The Detention, Confinement, and Incarceration of
Pregnant Women for the Benefit of Fetal Health, 16 Colum. J. Gender & L.
147 (2007); Meghan Horn, Note: Mothers Versus Babies: Constitutional and Policy
Problems with Prosecutions for Prenatal Maternal Substance Abuse, 14
Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 635 (2008); and Ian Vandewalker, Taking the Baby
Before It’s Born: Termination of the Parental Rights of Women Who Use Illegal
Drugs While Pregnant, 32 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change
423 (2008).
For a discussion of the
disproportionate impact of state policies on minority women, see Joanne E. Brosh & Monica Miller, Regulating Pregnancy Behavior:
How the Constitutional Rights of Minority Women Are Disproportionately
Compromised, 16 Am. U. J. Gender Soc. Pol'y & L. 437 (2008).
5.
The Criminal Model v. the
Treatment Model.
For a discussion of the therapeutic
approach to the drug abuse problem, see Elizabeth E. Coleman & Monica K.
Miller, Assessing Legal Responses to Prenatal Drug Use: Can Therapeutic
Responses Produce More Positive Outcomes Than Punitive Responses?, 20
J.L. & Health 35 (2007).
For a comparative examination of criminal
prosecution of pregnant women between the US, Canada and France, see Linda C. Fentiman, Pursuing the Perfect Mother: Why America’s
Criminalization of Maternal Substance Abuse is Not the Answer - A Comparative
Legal Analysis, 15 Mich. J. Gender & L. 389 (2009).