Chapter 4.E--Damages and Settlement
Click here to
read the Health Care Quality Improvement Act, which governs the National
Practitioner Data Bank. Its website contains
Annual Reports, which provide current statistics about trends in the number,
amount, and types of paid claims.
See also Medical
Malpractice Claiming In Texas. Medical Malpractice Insurance
Claims in Seven States, 2000-2004
Here are examples of large jury verdicts and settlements from Florida.
Links to each state's physician profile webpage can be
accessed at http://www.docboard.org/docfinder.html
The disclosure cite in Massachusetts is: http://profiles.massmedboard.org/MA-Physician-Profile-Find-Doctor.asp
Regarding per-diem computation of pain and suffering awards, see Note, 92 Va.
L. Rev. 289-325 (2006).
Further documenting the role that the plaintiff's attorney's experience plays in obtaining effective settlements, see Catherine Harries, et al., Does Being a Repeat Play Make a Difference?, 8 Yale J. Health Policy L & Ethics 253 (2008).
Noting that, because pain and suffering awards often are reduced by post-judgment settlements or otherwise not paid, one study calculated that caps on noneconomic damages have much less an effect on actual payouts than do caps that include economic damages. David Hyman, et al., Estimating the Effect of Damages Caps in Medical Malpractice Cases , 1 J. Leg. Analysis 355 (2009).
The following problem can be used to explore how damages are calculated and how
settlement strategy is devised in a typical medical malpractice case. This
problem was developed by Temple University law professor and experienced
litigator Frank M. McClellan, in Medical Malpractice: Law, Tactics, and Ethics
(1994)
Problem: Valuing a "Personal Injury"
Joe Jenks is paralyzed from the waist down as a result of negligently performed surgery on his back. At the time of the surgery he was thirty years of age and employed as a forklift operator for Wheeling Manufacturing Co. He graduated from high school at age eighteen, spent two years in the army (receiving an honorable discharge), and immediately after discharge went to work for Wheeling. Before the surgery he was in good health, except for chronic back pain that plagued him for six months after he fell while playing basketball. He earned $30,000 as a forklift operator in the year before the accident. In addition, that same year he earned $20,000 moonlighting as a security guard on evenings and weekends. He has never been married and lives alone.
He was a below-average student in high school, graduating at the bottom of his class. He was, however, a well-liked and ambitious young man who had a strong aptitude for mechanics. His paralysis is permanent.
Jenks has filed suit against his orthopedic surgeon, alleging that the surgery was negligently performed and that he was not adequately informed of the risks of the surgery. If a jury decides the case in favor of Jenks, what is the likely award? How much is the case worth if it is settled without a lawsuit? How much is the case worth if it is settled after commencement of a lawsuit but before substantial discovery? How much is the case worth if it is settled on the day of trial when the parties are ready to pick a jury? What additional information would you want before placing a value on the case? . . .
In assessing the settlement value of the case, it is useful to list the dominant factors that may influence the verdict and assign a grade to each factor. . . . Counsel might come up with the following figures:
|
Past
diminution in earning capacity |
$
30,000 |
|
Future
diminution in earning capacity |
$
900,000 |
|
Past
medical expenses |
$
120,000 |
|
Future
medical expenses |
$
650,000 |
|
Pain
and suffering and other intangibles |
$1,700,000 |
|
High
verdict potential |
$3,400,000 |
This
figure used for pain and suffering equals the special damages. As such it is
relatively conservative in terms of multiples customarily used by attorneys and
adjusters in settlement negotiations.
Next counsel must assess the potential impact of the factors that influence damage awards on this potential high verdict. In our example counsel will assign a percentage value to each of the considerations and arrive at an average percentage that he will use to multiply the high potential verdict. If a particular factor supports the high potential verdict, he will assign a high percentage, and if it is detrimental to the verdict, he will assign a low percentage.
|
Strength
of liability evidence |
|
|
75% |
|
Attitude
of judge |
|
|
50% |
|
Attractiveness
of plaintiff |
|
|
100% |
|
Attractiveness
of defendant |
|
|
50% |
|
Strength
of damage experts |
|
|
75% |
|
Attitude
of jury in jurisdiction |
|
|
10% |
|
Total |
|
|
360% |
|
Average
percentage |
|
|
60% |
In this
example the probable award would come to 60 percent of $3,400,000, or
$2,040,000. The probable award was derived by multiplying the average
percentage attributed to the factors that influence verdicts by the high
verdict potential. The same formula may be used to project the probable low
verdict if there is a serious dispute as to such special damage items as income
loss or future medical expenses.
Obviously,
this kind of computation is not a scientific exercise, and it lacks an
empirical basis to support its use. In addition, the illustration does not
address the important considerations of inflation and
reduction-to-present-value approaches that may be required in the jurisdiction.
The goal of the illustration is simply to . . . conduct a realistic evaluation
of the settlement value of the case and prepare an effective case on damages in
the event that the case cannot be settled.
Return to home page.